You are not logged in to Prodigits. Please register or login.

Subject: TRUMP2024

crail 23.07.25 - 04:11am
(Dunno) seems pretty unlikely * +

3mel 23.07.25 - 05:45am

I haven't heard anything approaching a compelling legal case yet. * +

wakeup4 23.07.25 - 10:39am

Youre not a lawyer though are you Mel its all there in the declassified documents and many more to come. * +

wakeup4 23.07.25 - 10:43am
Before the election in 2016 the intel was that Russia didnt have the capability or intent to interfere with the election. Then when trump won Obama instructed his cronies to manufacture the intel using the discredited Christopher Steele dossier. Your boy is caught red handed mel. * +

3mel 23.07.25 - 10:45am

I'm no lawyer true but I'm hearing Gabbard is conflating already known facts about the scope and findings of one inquiry and projecting that over another to make it say something that NEITHER DO.

this is invented to distract you from the fact that at a bare minimum trump knew exactly what Epstein was the whole time and didn't care... that's the best case scenario for him and that's damning enough. * +

3mel 23.07.25 - 10:48am

one point was about the infrastructure of their voting machines so when they found Russia had no capability it was true.

then they later concluded Russia did try to interfere in terms of bot farms for social media coverage. Gabbard is lining up two things that have nothing to do with one another... you're being played.

when she was reciting her prepared notes on Bartorola's show she had the look of someone towing the line albeit somewhat skillfully. * +

3mel 23.07.25 - 12:19pm
oh and Marco Rubio chaired one of the committees that arrived at these conclusions so watch his face during all this... if he's not hiding. * +

+ go to page 1-535
+ my page
+ functions
3 search
4 submit a reply
6 first page
7 last page
+ bookmark
8 General Chat Forum
9 Forum Index

Custom Search